[Read More: http://is.gd/HuNXzq]
Summary:
Manufacturers and suppliers of mechanical insulation and system accessories
typically provide datasheets listing a host of physical properties. This
Bulletin offers that the importance of thermal conductivity (k-factor) and
water vapor transmission (WVT) of
the insulant typically far outweighs the impact of other physical properties.
Thus refrigeration system specifiers, engineers,
procurement managers, contractors and owners should focus heavily on these two
physical properties when comparing alternative insulation materials.
In essence,
compromising the k-factor of the insulant costs a lot of money via energy losses as well as process
inefficiencies. Specifier/engineers
and end-users should strive for a credible cost vs. benefit analysis before
thermal conductivity is sacrificed for the sake of another physical property.
Vapor barriers, on
the other hand, are the first line of defense against moisture intrusion - -
with the insulant as backup defense. Since there are now several suppliers
offering zero-perm sheets, tapes, and mastics, specifiers and owners have no
reason to compromise by selecting a vapor retarder with poorer perm
ratings. The permeance of the insulant, as a backup to a damaged or a
poorly-installed vapor barrier, is also a critical factor when selecting an
insulant since over the life of the system it may be a lifesaver.
Of the insulant
and vapor barrier alternatives available, Dyplast’s ISO-C1®
polyisocyanurate is the obvious choice for refrigeration applications. ISO-C1’s
combination of 5.7 R-factor per inch (at 75°F) and WVT permeability of 1.65
perm-in is superior to any other alternative insulant, which is each
handicapped by either a lower R or a higher WVT. And for vapor barriers, DyPerm™
Wrap and Tape offer zero-perm performance, besting the better-known
alternatives.
C-factor is the k-factor divided by the
thickness of the insulation material. The R-factor per inch can be determined
by R=1/k. The higher the R factor, the better the insulation.